To our surprise,
the Padshanama does not mention any details about the construction process.
Wouldn’t the biographer fill pages about the herculean construction process
undertaken by the Emperor to enshrine his queen? Why does the Padshanama fail
to list details? Our search, through the documents, provide us with only the
following information which leaves us completely stunned! From pages 401 to 403
of the Padshanama, we get the curious piece of information that a tract of land
with a domed palace was purchased from Raja Jai Singh for the
purpose of burying the queen. The lines 29 to 38 from page 403 of Volume 1 of the
Padshanama are listed below. The important words and phrases are highlighted in
the table below.
28. The site
covered with a majestic magnificent lush garden, to the south of that great
city and
|
28. Nihayat
rifaat wa nizaahat keh junoobrooe aan misr jaama' astwa
|
29. Amidst which
(garden) the building
known as the palace (Manzil) of Raja Mansingh, at present owned by
Raja Jaisingh,
|
29. Pesh az ein
Manzil-e Rajah Mansigh bood wadaree waqt ba Rajah Jaisingh
|
30. Grandson (of
Mansingh), was selected for the burial of the Queen whose abode is in heaven
|
30. Nabirae
talluq dasht bara-e-madfan e ann bashist muwaattan bar guzeedand
|
31. Although
Raja Jaisingh valued it greatly as his ancestral heritage and property, yet.
he would have been agreeable to part with it gratis for the Emperor Shahjahan
|
31. Agarcheh
Raja Jaisingh husule ein dawlatra foze azeem danisht anmab
|
32. (Still) out
of sheer scrupulousness so essential in matters
of bereavement
and religious sanctity (thinking it improper
to take his
palace gratis)
|
32. Az rooe
ahatiyaat keh dar jameeye shewan khususan umoore diniyeh naguzir ast
|
33. In exchange of that
(aali Manzil) grand
palace, he (Jaisingh) was granted a piece of government land
|
33. Dar' awaz
aan aali manzil-e az khalisa e sharifah badoo marahmat farmoodand
|
34. After the
arrival of the dead body in that great city (Agra) on 15th Jamadul Saniya.
|
34. Baad az
rasidane naash ba aan shahar-e karamat bahar panz dahun Jamadi Ussanieh
|
35. Next year that
illustrious body of the heavenly Queen was laid to rest
|
35. Sale
aayandeh paikare nooranee-e aan aamaanee jowhar ba khake pak sipurdeh aamad
|
36. The
officials of the capital, according to the royal orders of the day, under the sky-high lofty
mausoleum
|
36. Wa
mutasaddiyan-e darul khilafah ba hukme muallae ajaalatul waqt turbat-e-falak
martabate
|
37. Hid (the
body of) that pious lady from the eyes of the world, and this Palace (Imarat-e-Aalishan) so majestic
and (capped) with a dome
|
37. Aan jahan
iffatra az nazar poshidand. wa Imaarate - e -aalee shaan wa gumbaze
|
38. So lofty
that in its stature (it) is a memorial to the courage of sky-dimensions
|
38. Rafi bunyan
keh ta rastakheez dar balandee yadgare himmate gardoon rifaat
|
A close scrutiny,
of the pages from the Padshanama proves without any doubt that Shah Jahan did
not build the Taj Mahal. He selected a palace owned by Raja Jai Singh as the
perfect place to entomb his wife. He couldn’t have demolished the existing palace
since; pulling down a building takes many months. There is no way the old building
could have been demolished and a new building constructed within one year. The
legends also state that the bricks used for the construction where baked on
site but, none of the European travelers who travelled through Agra during 1631
and 1632 record seeing kilns used to bake bricks on site, and or the materials
hauled away from the site. All of them, however record visiting the completed
Taj Mahal which was by then a tourist attraction.
We also came
across a letter written by Aurangazeb to his father complaining about the leaky
dome of the old building in which his mother was buried. This letter further
supports the point that the building was purchased and was not constructed. In the
letter dated 1652, Aurangazeb states that he visited his mother’s mausoleum but
was distressed to see that the dome was leaking at two or three places. His
letter also mentions water leaks at many of the other royal rooms, secret rooms
and the four smaller cupolas. If we assume that the foundation stone to build
the Taj Mahal complex was laid in the year 1631, the Taj wouldn’t have been
ready by 1653. Even if it had been partially completed by 1652, being brand
new, it wouldn’t be expected to leak at so many places. The letter also lists
other repairs required to bring the building up to code. How is it then that by
1652, the supposedly newly built Taj Mahal required elaborate repairs?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.